ANALYSIS
The idea of reflective judiciary is being projected as measure to overcome and manage diversity
The Constituent Assembly and numerous Supreme Court judgments have restated that economic criterion cannot be the sole basis for granting reservation.
In spite of that, the Modi government announced 10% quota for economically weaker section (EWS) through 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act. This political move has been confronted, but the apex court refused to grant an interim injunction on the EWS quota.
In a similar move, the Supreme Court refused to stay the Bombay High Court’s decision to uphold reservations for the Maratha community in educational institutions and jobs in public services in Maharashtra.
Apex Court’s denial to grant an interim injunction on EWS quota and the Maratha quota exhibits an abundant dichotomy in judicial policy while dealing with social justice.
Judicial discourse on reservation beginning 1950, focused on expanding formal equality as enshrined under Articles 15(1) and 29(2) and drastically confining the principle of substantive equality inherently embedded in Articles 14, 15, 16, 38, 46, 332, 335, 338 and 340.
This strategy was initially developed to pre-empt claims of proportionate representation in educational institutions on mythical grounds.
The first-ever attempt for reservation did not find favour with the Constitution bench composed of upper caste elite judges in Champakam Dorairajan case (1951) because it marginally restricted upper caste space by prescribing their percentage of representation and created some space for Bahujan students in the process.
This left no option for a determined Periyar and Babasaheb Ambedkar to claim the Bahujan space in educational institutions by convincing the Parliament to pass the First Constitutional Amendment, which enabled the State to make special provision for the representation of Bahujan class in educational institutions.
Despite this, constitutional courts deployed the ‘judicial policy of postponement of social justice’ to deny Bahujan representation both in educational institutions and state services.
The State of Mysore strived to make special provision for the advancement of the socially and educationally backward classes of citizens under Article 15 (4) of the Constitution since 1958, and every time it faced stiff resistance from the High Court of Mysore until it reached to the apex court in Balaji case.
The Supreme Court packed with elite and upper caste judges, underplayed the role of caste and carefully crafted the economic argument to prevent social and educational arguments from taking strong roots.
Interestingly, caste as a factor for determining backwardness was marginalised by unfairly assuming that the test of castes would be inapplicable to Muslims and Christians.
It also prevented the categorization of OBCs into Backward Class and More Backward Class by holding that such a categorisation is outside the scope of Article 15(4).
The strategic interpretation of the Balaji case was legitimised over the decades by courts, jurists, journalists and textbook writers.
For instance, the Supreme Court in Devadasan (1963) and Chitralekha (1964) reiterated the economic argument of Balaji with greater emphasis. Such reasoning was utilised by the constitutional courts to delay social justice so that the ruling class was able to develop neutralising strategies.
However, relentless social movements forced the Supreme Court to concede some space in the N M Thomas case (1975), but the higher judiciary’s unbending resistance continued.
A similar thread of thought runs through Indira Sawhney v. Union of India (1993), when the nine-judge bench, while upholding the 50% reservation in favour of backward class, stated that the very idea of reservation implies the selection of a less meritorious person and cost has to be paid if the constitutional promise of social justice is to be redeemed.
The Court cautioned that there are certain services and positions such as technical posts in research and development organisations/departments/institutions, in specialities and super specialities in medicine, engineering and other such courses in Physical Sciences and Mathematics, in defence and connected services, promotions where merit alone counts.
Later in Mohan Bir Singh Chawla v. Punjab University (1997), Sadhna Devi (Dr) v. State of U. P., (1997) and Dr PritiSagar Srivastava vs. State of M.P. (1997), the Court admonished that reservation in higher levels of education would be dangerous and belittle merit and excellence.
However, surprisingly, the Supreme Court appeared to be more generous when it comes to upper caste issues. Apex court declined to grant a stay on the Centre’s decision to grant 10% reservation to economically weaker sections in the general category in jobs and educational institutions.
But it had stayed the central government’s policy to introduce 27% reservation for the OBCs in central educational institutions for one year before it upheld its constitutionality. Even in the Indira Sawhney case, the Supreme Court granted an interim stay at the time of admission.
Constitutional court’s dubious approach was also seen in the Maratha reservation policy, which came under the spotlight when the poll-bound Devendra Fadnavis-led government enacted a law to grant 16% reservation for the Maratha community.
The Bombay High Court upheld the law, in spite of the fact that the state’s reservation quota exceeded 60%. Introduction of 13-point roster and dilution of SC, ST Atrocities Act by the higher judiciary further indicates the perpetuity of such alignment.
To overcome the difficulties created by the judiciary, the Parliament has from time to time, brought amendments in the Constitution, but how to overcome this persistent judicial resistance has become a moot question.
The idea of the reflective judiciary is being projected as one of the measures to overcome this problem and manage diversity. The social construction of judicial power is a delicate and complex issue, but the government will have to conceive a scheme to not only enhance the quality of justice administered by the courts but also to restore greater faith of all sections of the society in the judiciary.
Author is registrar, National Law University, Odisha
Why Mahindra XUV700 is perfect for road trips and off-road adventures
Mahindra Scorpio N: A legacy of toughness with a modern twist
'Capable of loving more women': Kamal Haasan's bold take on marriage and relationships goes viral
How reaction time and speed tests can give gamers a competitive edge
This is world’s most polluted city with AQI of 1165, it’s just 409 kms away from Delhi
Blow to Gautam Adani as his company's shares fell 7% due to...
Pune Porsche crash: Father of teen driver's friend surrenders before court
Geographic and political nature of drug trafficking sea routes to India
Delhi AQI Update: Air quality turns 'severe', AQI reaches...
Mukesh Ambani's SUPERHIT new plan for Jio users, offers 100 GB of free cloud storage for just Rs...
Delhi-Mumbai expressway to slash travel time to 25 minutes: Key stretch to open on...
'Modi govt is committed to building terror-free India': Union Minister Amit Shah
Chhath Puja 2024: What is the importance of bamboo basket in Chhath Puja?
SC to deliver verdict today on plea against NCLAT order transferring Jet Airways to winning bidder
Is it time for Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma to step down from playing Test cricket?
Chhath Puja 2024: Are banks open or closed today? Check state-wise list here
DNA TV Show: How did Donald Trump win US elections despite his several controversies?
Sunil Mittal's Airtel joins hands with Indian Army, becomes only private company to...
Shah Rukh Khan's Mannat to Amitabh Bachchan's Jalsa: 5 most expensive celebrity homes in India
IPL 2025 auction: 42-year-old England legend registers for first time, his base price is...
Stranger Things season 5 teaser reveals episode titles, release date confirmed as...
Singer Rahul Vaidya buys 3110 sq ft luxury apartment worth Rs 90000000, it is located in...
Nimrat Kaur asks Abhishek Bachchan ‘would you distract Aaradhya’, he praises Aishwarya Rai in reply
JEE Advanced 2025: Candidates now allowed to give 3 attempts, check details inside
Watch: MS Dhoni's video of playing golf with Donald Trump goes viral after US Polls
Viral: Italy's Lake Como's 'fresh air' can being sold for Rs 907, details inside
Ranji Trophy: Jalaj Saxena scripts history, becomes first cricketer to achieve massive feat
Gautam Adani congratulates Donald Trump on winning US elections, says, 'If there is one person...'
Meet Usha Chilukuri, who is set to become first Indian-origin second lady of US, she is wife of...
Delhi NCR: Traffic advisory issued in Ghaziabad ahead of Chhath Puja 2024, check routes to avoid
ICC Test Rankings: Rishabh Pant breaks into top 10; Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma suffer massive loss
NASA's Sunita Williams witnesses 16 sunrises, sunsets daily in space, here’s how
'India will…': Ricky Ponting makes BOLD prediction for Border-Gavaskar Trophy
From DU to Tesla: Meet man who works for Elon Musk, manages his company's...
Essence of Leadership: Insights from Ankur Saini
Who is Thomas Draca? First Italian player to register for IPL 2025 mega auction
IPL 2025 mega auction: Full list of players with Rs 2 crore base price
Meet man who quit Paytm after Rs 2048 crore deal with Deepinder Goyal's Zomato, he is...
Anushka Sharma can't stop laughing seeing Virat Kohli's funny move in unseen viral video - Watch
SA vs IND: Arshdeep Singh aims to surpass Bhuvneshwar Kumar’s all-time T20I record
Donald Trump reclaims US presidency, netizens win hearts with meme-fest
'Everyone will come to know...': LoP Rahul Gandhi's BIG statement on caste census in Nagpur
Thama: Ayushmann Khurrana reveals all about 'bloody love story', says it is....
'History’s greatest comeback': Israel PM Netanyahu congratulates Donald Trump on US Election victory
US Election Results LIVE: Donald Trump's victory speech; WATCH HERE
Arjun Kapoor hits back at haters post Singham Again success: 'To everyone who...'
'Let's work for global peace': PM Modi congratulates 'friend' Donald Trump on winning US election