Softbank-backed OYO leaves small hoteliers, customers in lurch

Written By Ashish K Tiwari | Updated: Jun 26, 2019, 05:00 AM IST

The major grudge of hoteliers is on the pricing and a host of charges that get levied on the hotel asset owner for partnering with OYO

Customers booking hotel rooms on the OYO platform may be in for a rude shock.

A large number of OYO partner hotel owners are at loggerheads with the Softbank-backed OYO Hotels & Homes, which claims to be the largest in India with 9,000 properties in its network. Among reasons for this tussle are OYO's alleged disregard to agreed floor prices, deep discounting practices, non-transparent charges, irrelevant levies in addition to high-handedness and one-sided enforcement of the contract when it comes to deliverables by the hotel asset owner(s).

Unhappy with the way the OYO partnership has panned out, Neeraj Chaudhary, owner of LRH Services Apartment located five kilometres from Pune International Airport stopped checking in OYO customers. Speaking to DNA Money, Chaudhary said that it's been eight months and now he has decided to move out of OYO owing to the hotel company's unfriendly business policies.

NOT WELCOME

  • The major grudge of hoteliers is on the pricing and a host of charges that get levied on the hotel asset owner for partnering with OYO
     
  • Among reasons for the tussle are OYO's deep discounting practices, non-transparent charges, irrelevant levies, hoteliers allege

"Customers with OYO bookings are politely informed about our decision to not honour their bookings and are checked in as walk-in guests. Alternatively, we ask them to make a fresh booking at our property using other online travel agency (OTA) portals. Having said that, guests with OYO bookings (at deeply discounted prices) are being offered rates quoted on OYO as a goodwill gesture for now. However, we will soon go back to our original rates and stop all bookings from OYO," he said.

Going a step further, the owner of four properties in Pune, of which one is listed with OYO, has asked the hotel chain not to take any bookings for his property. Chaudhary has also made it clear that he doesn't want to continue with OYO anymore. "I am yet to receive any response from the OYO support team," he said.

The major grudge, according to hoteliers that DNA Money spoke to, is on the pricing and a host of charges that get levied on the hotel asset owner for partnering with OYO.

For instance, an air-conditioned double occupancy room with a floor price of Rs 2,200 gets sold to the customer at a deep discount Rs 1,000. OYO then deducts a convenience charge on this Rs 1,000 followed by a commission that's upwards of 20%, depending on its agreement with the asset owner. These charges are on a single booking. There are also concerns about the treatment of goods and services tax (GST) by OYO.

At this stage, the hotel owner gets about 60%, or Rs 600 odd of the deep discounted room rate. Then there are additional monthly deductions at the property level, in the form of performance linked bonus (PLB) charges and audit fees. Eventually, the asset owner is left with just a fraction of the total revenue that's not good enough to cover the hotels' cost of operations.

The Pune-based hotelier is among a large number of asset owners across the country who are not happy with the policies adopted by the Ritesh Agarwal-promoted OYO. In fact, this decision by partner hotels to deny OYO bookings has come after the hotel chain said it will levy a double penalty if bookings by customers are not honoured. OYO had also said that it will de-prioritise the hotels' listing on its platform and or remove the hotel altogether in case of repeated check-in denials. DNA Money had first reported this development in its edition on June 11, 2019.

Miffed with OYO's decision, a number of partner hotels decided to take the protest route to express their displeasure. Activities started gathering momentum early last week. Hotel asset owners from different pockets of the country started coming together to voice their concerns against OYO's unfriendly business practices.

Refuting any instances of check-in denials as well as exits initiated by partner hotel asset owners in markets like Pune, Gujarat, Gurugram, and UP, a spokesperson from OYO Hotels & Homes, said, "We are not seeing any unusual patterns of check-in denials emerging from our data on UP, Haryana, Gujarat, and Maharashtra."

The spokesperson added that in isolated situations (of check-in denials), OYO take a series of steps to ensure the customer doesn't suffer. "Our 24x7 customer support team works round the clock alongside ground teams to quickly ensure that customers with valid bookings are shifted to a premium upgraded property of OYO in the vicinity at no extra cost to the customer," said the spokesperson.

Protests were held last week by asset owners in Gurugram, who are part of the Guest House Welfare Association (GHWA), against deep discounting coupled with significantly high commission rates, to the tune of 40% to 50%, being charged by OYO on every booking.

Similarly, on June 20, 2019, a nationwide protest was being initiated by Anurag Saxena, president, Hotelier Welfare Association, Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh (UP). The association has been fighting against OYO's malpractices and high-handedness for over 18 months now. However, just a day before on June 19, 2019, OYO managed to get an injunction/ restraining order from Delhi High Court against the office bearers of the association. As a result, the nationwide protest could not be held.

As far as the injunction order is concerned, the OYO spokesperson said, "In a situation we noticed in a city, where a certain individual along with a vested interest group was preventing OYO hotel owners from abiding by their contractual agreements, the Delhi High Court has issued an injunction that prevents groups from obstructing the activities of OYO hotel owners and disrupting their business. This is a testament to how OYO is committed to ensuring great quality experiences and if and when pressurised by asset owners to give in to their unreasonable demand by threatening to disrupt the service or deny check-ins to customers, we have legal recourse available."

The right to protest, the OYO spokesperson said, by one individual must not interfere with the right to livelihood of another individual. "OYO is fully committed to one-on-one discussions with all its asset owner partners as well as providing 24x7 support to anyone who faces harassment and intimidation," the spokesperson said.