Directed by Tinu Suresh Desai, 1920 London is the third installment in the 1920 horror franchise. Starring Sharman Joshi, Meera Chopra, Vishal Karwal, and Sushmita Mukherjee, the movie deals with supernatural in 'Vikram Bhatt' style.
Here's what critics have to say about the movie -
1. The Indian Express -
Hats off for at least the ambition — and there are plenty of those to doff, this being early England and all. Few films, fewer still with the limited scale of a Vikram Bhatt horror, swing as frequently between 1920 London and 1920 “somewhere in Mewar, Rajasthan” — on streamers no less. An infinitesimal number, hopefully, do so chasing an “aatma” that resides in a locket. Read more here
2. Firstpost -
Sharman Joshi tries hard to play menacing, mysterious and repentant but he’s just out of step in the part of an exorcist. Meera Chopra is unimpressive as the helpless wife while Karwal spends most of the film lying in a bed being eaten away by the evil spirit. Read more here
3. Deccan Chronicle -
The third instalment of the 1920 franchise ‘1920 London’ is anything but scary. Directed by Tinu Suresh Desai, this film is a sloppy take on yet another horror flick. I am still trying hard to fathom what was going through Vikram Bhatt’s mind when he penned down this stale love triangle, with a demon vying hard for some attention. Read more here
4. Bollywoodlife -
The latest entry in the 1920 series disappoints big time, with Sharman Joshi being the only saving grace. Watch the film only if you don’t have anything else to do. Read more here
5. The Times of India -
There isn't an inkling of innovative thinking in the third installment of the 1920 series. The best thing that can be said about it is that it will remain one of the year's funniest films. Read more here
