Elected representatives to state Assemblies and the Parliament are gearing up to vote in the next president of India in Monday’s poll. With intricate math behind the voting, MPs and MLAs from across India will vote. For the Presidential Elections, While the value of votes of MPs is much higher at 700, the highest value of votes is carried by MLAs from Uttar Pradesh at 208. On the other hand, those from Sikkim carry the lowest. This vote value is calculated on the basis of the total population of the state, based on the 1971 census.

COMMERCIAL BREAK
SCROLL TO CONTINUE READING

Here’s a breakdown of MLA vote value and cumulative value of votes from different states. 

State: Uttar Pradesh Vote value of each MLA: 208Number of MLAs: 403 Total Vote Value: 83,824

State: Tamil Nadu Vote value of each MLA: 176Number of MLAs: 234Total Vote Value: 41,184 

State: JharkhandVote value of each MLA: 176 Number of MLAs: 81 Total Vote Value: 14,256. 

State: Maharashtra Vote value of each MLA: 175Number of MLAs: 288Total Vote Value: 50,400 

State: BiharVote value of each MLA: 173Number of MLAs: 243Total Vote Value: 42,039 

State: Andhra Pradesh Vote value of each MLA: 159Number of MLAs: 175Total Vote Value: 27,825

State: KeralaVote value of each MLA: 152Number of MLAs: 140Total Vote Value: 21280

State: West BengalVote value of each MLA: 151Number of MLAs: 294Total Vote Value: 44394

State: OdishaVote value of each MLA: 149Number of MLAs: 147Total Vote Value: 21903

State: GujaratVote value of each MLA: 147Number of MLAs: 182Total Vote Value: 26754

State: TelanganaVote value of each MLA: 132Number of MLAs: 119Total Vote Value: 15708

State: Madhya PradeshVote value of each MLA: 131Number of MLAs: 230Total Vote Value: 30130

State: KarnatakaVote value of each MLA: 131Number of MLAs: 224Total Vote Value: 29344

State: ChhattisgarhVote value of each MLA: 129Number of MLAs: 90Total Vote Value: 11610

State: RajasthanVote value of each MLA: 129Number of MLAs: 200Total Vote Value: 25800

State: AssamVote value of each MLA: 116Number of MLAs: 126Total Vote Value: 14616

State: PunjabVote value of each MLA: 116Number of MLAs: 117Total Vote Value: 13572

State: HaryanaVote value of each MLA: 112Number of MLAs: 90Total Vote Value: 10080

State: UttarakhandVote value of each MLA: 64Number of MLAs: 70Total Vote Value: 4480

UT: Delhi NCTVote value of each MLA: 58Number of MLAs: 70Total Vote Value: 4060

State: Himachal PradeshVote value of each MLA: 51Number of MLAs: 68Total Vote Value: 3468

State: TripuraVote value of each MLA: 26Number of MLAs: 60Total Vote Value: 1560

State: GoaVote value of each MLA: 20Number of MLAs: 40Total Vote Value: 800

State: ManipurVote value of each MLA: 18Number of MLAs: 60Total Vote Value: 1080

State: MeghalayaVote value of each MLA: 17Number of MLAs: 60Total Vote Value: 1020

UT: PuducherryVote value of each MLA: 16 Number of MLAs: 30Total Vote Value: 480

State: NagalandVote value of each MLA: 9Number of MLAs: 60Total Vote Value: 540

State: MizoramVote value of each MLA: 8Number of MLAs: 40Total Vote Value: 320

State: Arunachal PradeshVote value of each MLA: 8Number of MLAs: 60Total Vote Value: 480

State: SikkimVote value of each MLA: 7Number of MLAs: 32Total Vote Value: 224

READ | Doesn't even spare the departed: Congress targets PM after Gujarat SIT claims Ahmed Patel plotted against Narendra Modi

(With inputs from agencies)