NEW DELHI: Film maker Ram Gopal Varma's bid to make a remake of the 1970s blockbuster Sholay has run into rough weather with the Delhi High Court restraining its release.
The roadblocks for the release of the film in which superstar Amitabh Bachchan has assumed the roll of Gabbar Singh came recently on a lawsuit filed by the grandson of G P Sippy, who had produced Sholay.
The suit filed by Sippy Films Pvt Ltd and Sholay Media and Entertainment Pvt Ltd, owned by Sascha Sippy and Shan Uttam Singh had sought stay on the release of Varma's film maintaining the use of the name Sholay by any other entity amounts to infringement of trade mark and copyright.
In the suit filed through the law firm Anand and Anand, they contended that they also have copyright on the use of character Gabbar Singh, which was played by late Amjad Khan in Sholay.
Sascha Sippy, director of the Sippy Films, claimed that the late G P Sippy's son Ajit Sippy who reportedly sold the copyrights to Varma, had no such rights himself to transfer the same to others.
Besides Varma, Justice Gita Mittalissued notices to his production house K Sera Sera, its managing director, P M Sanghvi and Ajit Sippy.
The suit was filed after it was reported that Verma had began shooting film titled -- Ram Gopal Varma Ki Sholay.
The suit said the use of names -- Sholay and Gabbar Singh -- by Varma also amounts to infringement of moral right as there was threat to destruction of original work.
He submitted the script and screenplay of Sholay are the original literary works, protected under Sections 14 and 51 of the Copyright Act of 1957.
Remake of Sholay infringes no copyright: RGV
Reacting to the notice issued by Delhi High Court with regard to alleged infringement of copyright, film maker Ram Gopal Varma said he had no intention of infringing any copyright in his remake of 1970 blocbuster Sholay.
"In the way I am making my film, I am not infringing any copyright nor do I intend to," Varma said.
However, he refused to comment further saying his defence will be placed before the Delhi High Court in the course of arguments.
