Pakistani-American businessman Mansoor Ijaz, the main accuser in the memo scandal, on Thursday claimed that Pakistan's former envoy Husain Haqqani had acted on the directions of senior government leaders and had devised 'bad boys' as code words to refer to army and ISI chiefs.
Ijaz made the remarks on the second day of his deposition via videoconferencing from London before a Pakistani judicial commission probing the memo scandal which sparked a political crisis in the country.
However, Ijaz offered no information that was not already included in statements he had filed in Pakistan's Supreme Court.
He claimed that Haqqani, the former Pakistani envoy to US, who was forced to resign after the memo issue became public late last year, had devised the code words like 'bad boys' to the refer to the chiefs of the Pakistan Army and Inter-Services Intelligence.
Ijaz said in his testimony that the envoy wrote him a message referring to the Pakistani government as friend. He also claimed that Ispahani, which is Haqqani's wife's second name, was the secret code for the Americans.
He further claimed Haqqani had said the Pakistan government was willing to give the US access to the widows of Osama bin Laden after the al-Qaeda leader was killed in a raid by American forces at Abbottabad in May last year.
He also acknowledged that he had prepared the first draft of the alleged memo by himself without taking the consent of Haqqani.
Ijaz went to the Pakistan High Commission in London to continue his deposition, which had begun yesterday, while the three-judge commission appointed by the Supreme Court conducted the proceedings from Islamabad.
Following a complaint from Haqqani's lawyer Zahid Bukhari about Ijaz's long-winded statements, the panel asked Ijaz to make brief comments.
The Pakistani-American businessman presented more documents to the commission and showed what he claimed were messages on his mobile phone and emails on his laptop that pertained to his communications with Haqqani.
Bukhari said these communications should be subjected to a forensic examination before he began his cross-examination of Ijaz.
Ijaz read out a purported BlackBerry conversation with Haqqani and told the commission he had sent a message to Haqqani on May 9 about forwarding a message to American officials.
Haqqani replied shortly thereafter in a message in which he talked about the Inter-Services Intelligence and army chiefs, Ijaz claimed.
The judicial commission also took up several applications filed by Bukhari, including one opposing the move to cross-examine Ijaz via a video link.
Bukhari said he should be given time to travel to London so that he could personally question Ijaz rather than via a video link.
Bukhari also sought copies of all the evidence provided by Ijaz.
However, this was opposed by Ijaz's lawyer Akram Sheikh, who said some of the evidence was "secret" and could not be shared with everyone.
