- LATEST
- WEBSTORY
- TRENDING
INDIA
Mamata meme case: SC asks Priyanka Sharma to apologise, says it will 'not operate as precedent'
SC written order gives clarity.
1.SC doesn't agree to the argument that Priyanka merely shared it
At the outset, senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, appearing for Priyanka's brother Rajib Sharma who has filed the plea in the apex court, said she was arrested and sent to 14-day judicial custody just for sharing the post which was already widely viral.
"She is not the creator of the meme but only shared it on social media which was already shared by thousands of people," Kaul said.
To this, the bench said, "There cannot be any equality to the wrong. Your freedom of speech and expression is non-negotiable but your freedom ends when it infringes upon the rights of other." The top court said it could direct her forthwith release but she has to tender an apology for sharing the post.
"We have seen the picture which has been shared. If someone is hurt then you can apologise for it," the bench said.
Kaul contended that apology will have a chilling effect on the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression.
"We do not see that there should be any difficulty for you in apologising for your post on social media. We are not asking you to apologise for others.
"Let her tender an apology we will forthwith grant bail. You take instruction. Since you are member of BJP the insinuation is different. The other side may have taken it differently. Had you been a common person, then may be it could have been no problem," the bench said.
2.Priyanka Sharma's counsel's argument
Kaul said the provisions of IT Act and IPC under which she was arrested does not apply in this case.
Referring to the apex court's verdict in Shreya Singhal case in which the court had scrapped section 66A of the IT Act, Kaul said Sharma has been arrested by the police under this provision also.
The court said that it was keeping the question of law open on whether arrest can be made for sharing such posts and at present is only dealing with the bail.
"You are a member of a political party. Elections are going on. We understand all these things," the bench said, adding that "you cannot put anybody's face on anybody. If it is going round. It is wrong".
Kaul contended that such an apology would have a chilling effect on freedom and speech and expression and tomorrow West Bengal police can arrest anybody for four days for giving a statement and then ask for an apology.
"If you say sorry, it does not bring you down. We are not going on the angle of freedom of speech and expressions," the bench told Kaul at the fag end of hearing. On Monday, Kaul had mentioned the matter in the top court for urgent hearing saying Sharma was forced to move the apex court as there was a complete strike in local courts till May 14 in Howrah and moreover, she had been remanded in 14 day judicial custody by a Howrah court on May 11.
Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) entails punishment for defamation with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.
Sharma had allegedly shared on Facebook the photo in which Banerjee's face has been photo-shopped on to actor Priyanka Chopra's picture from the MET Gala event in New York.
Her arrest was followed by protests from the BJP and other social media users.
3.SC order gives 'wrong message': Poonam Mahajan
BJP leader Poonam Mahajan said Tuesday the party's youth wing will challenge the Supreme Court order asking its activist Priyanka Sharma to apologise for posting a meme of West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee on social media, asserting the verdict has sent out a "wrong message".
The court earlier Tuesday granted bail to Sharma, against whom a complaint was filed in Bengal for sharing a photo in which Banerjee's face was photoshopped onto actor Priyanka Chopra's picture from a MET Gala event in New York.
The apex court also asked Sharma to apologise in writing on her release from jail. It observed freedom of speech ends when it infringes upon the rights of others.Mahajan said she was "delighted" with the SC order and "grateful" to the court for releasing Sharma on bail.
"But the direction of apology sends out a wrong message on the question of free speech," she said."In July, when the writ petition is coming up, we are going to contest it because this is a bigger issue," said Mahajan, the president of BJP's Yuva Morcha.
West Bengal police arrested Sharma on May 10 under section 500 (defamation) of the IPC and under other provisions of the Information Technology Act on the complaint of local Trinamool Congress leader Vibhas Hazra.BJP leaders and social media users have protested Sharma's arrest.
"We have been battling the TMC in Bengal for two years and many of our activists have been arrested, beaten up and even killed by their goons. This has exposed how anarchy has spread in Bengal and how in Mamata didi's rule, freedom of expression has been strangled to death," Mahajan alleged.She alleged Banerjee was like "Hitler" and using her ego and power to suppress opposition.
"The workers in Bengal are not alone. We are with them, our party president, Amit Shah is with them," she said."The woman (Banerjee) who is always speaking of democratic rights and talking of how the Constitution is in danger, is not controlling her Hitleresque regime," the Yuva Morcha chief alleged.
Citing Sharma's case, she asked should the youth in the state "live in fear"?
