Personal Finance
For many investors who are eagerly searching for a best investment plan after retirement, a strategic combination of NPS and EPF with voluntary contributions through VPF can result in a diversified and stable retirement fund.
Updated : Aug 09, 2024, 03:03 PM IST
Retirement planning requires choosing the right investment strategy that provides the monetary safety net in your golden years. Among the schemes available, The National Pension Scheme (NPS) and Employee Provident Fund (EPF) emerge as two popular schemes that offer retirement benefits in India. Both schemes relay excellent returns, but which is the most suitable option for investment through a retirement lens? This blog determines to compare the features of both schemes, along with benefits and suitability for different retirement objectives and help you choose the best investment plan for retirement in India.
The National Pension System is a government-backed retirement financial savings scheme launched in January 2004. Its purpose is to provide pension solutions to all Indian citizens, including those who work in the private sector. NPS provides a combination of flexibility, transparency, and tax advantages. NPS is regarded as one of the best investment for retirement planning so check out its features mentioned below :
Check out the National pension scheme nps calculator to explore how much you need to invest to achieve your financial goal with a National Pension Scheme Investment.
The Employees’ Provident Fund is a mandatory savings scheme for salaried employees in India, governed by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO). It is designed to provide a lump sum amount to employees at the time of retirement. So if you are looking for a good investment plan for retirement plan then EPF is something that you can consider, check out its key features below :
Comparing NPS and EPF for choosing the ideal retirement plan for your future
|
NPS |
EPF |
Investment Returns |
NPS returns are marketplace-connected, meaning they rely upon the performance of the fairness, corporate bonds, and authorities securities wherein the funds are invested. Historically, NPS has supplied appealing returns, especially in the equity, which could vary between 10-14%. |
EPF gives constant returns declared yearly using the EPFO. The interest price for EPF has historically ranged between 89%, making it a strong and reliable alternative for risk-averse investors. |
Risk and Flexibility |
NPS permits subscribers to choose their funding mix, offering more flexibility and the potential for better returns.
However, it additionally comes with higher hazards, specifically in equity. |
EPF is a low-chance investment with guaranteed returns, making it appropriate for conservative traders. The fixed interest price ensures balance and protection of the corpus. |
Tax Benefits |
Contributions up to ₹1.5 lakh are tax deductible under Section 80C. An additional ₹50,000 can be claimed under Section 80CCD(1B). Employer contributions are also tax deductible under section 80CCD(2). Upon retirement, 60% of the corpus can be withdrawn tax-free, while the the remaining 40% must be used to purchase an annuity, subject to tax. |
Contributions up to ₹1.5 lakh are tax deductible under Section 80C. Maturity gains and corpus withdrawals are tax-free, provided certain conditions are met (such as five years of continuous employment). |
Withdrawal Rules |
Partial retirement is allowed in certain circumstances such as education, marriage, purchase of a house, and medical treatment. Upon retirement, 60% of the corpus can be withdrawn tax-free, and 40% must be used to purchase an annuity. |
Withdrawals are allowed in certain circumstances, such as retirement, unemployment, or specific major life events. If the employee has completed five years of continuous service, the entire corpus is tax-free. |
NPS is appropriate for persons with a high-risk tolerance who are seeking a long-term boom. The flexibility to pick out the funding blend allows for potential better returns, particularly with a better allocation to equities. This makes NPS an appealing alternative for younger investors who have an extended funding horizon and might resist marketplace fluctuations.
EPF is good for conservative traders looking for stability and guaranteed returns. The constant price and tax-free corpus make it a dependable alternative for folks who pick low-hazard funding. It is specifically useful for salaried employees who prefer a trouble-loose, automated deduction from their income.
One powerful strategy to maximize retirement financial savings is to switch voluntary contributions from the Voluntary Provident Fund (VPF) to the NPS earlier than retirement. Here’s how this can be useful:
VPF is an extension of EPF wherein personnel can contribute voluntarily beyond the required 12% of their fundamental profits. The interest rate for VPF is similar to that for EPF, and the contributions are eligible for tax deductions below Section 80C.
1. Higher Returns:
Assume an individual has been contributing to VPF and decides to switch the amassed corpus to NPS at the age of forty-five. Here’s how the corpus can develop:
By shifting the VPF corpus and making normal contributions to NPS, the man or woman can benefit from the power of compounding and doubtlessly accumulate a massive corpus by the age of 60.
Selecting between NPS and EPF are largely dependent on a person’s financial situation, goal, risk tolerance and retirement plan. While both the schemes offer benefits, a mix of these can provide a balanced, structured retirement portfolio.
For many investors who are eagerly searching for a best investment plan after retirement, a strategic combination of NPS and EPF with voluntary contributions through VPF can result in a diversified and stable retirement fund. Investments into the mix regularly, based on investment goals and changing market conditions can further increase the chances of a secure and prosperous retirement.
(This article is part of DMCL Consumer Connect Initiative, a paid publication programme. DMCL claims no editorial involvement and assumes no responsibility, liability or claims for any errors or omissions in the content of the article. The DMCL Editorial team is not responsible for this content.)